From Aaron Tan to Everyone: (1:43 pm)
Master’s tools = harnessing and refunctioning desire?
From Eleanor Dare to Everyone: (1:44 pm)
But refunctioning is to be defined by the affordances which were already wrong for us Question - sorry, not dogmatic answer
From Eleanor Dare to Everyone: (1:48 pm)
Precarity has been the signature of my relationship to academia
From Galia Kollectiv to Everyone: (1:49 pm)
The institution actively disables this horizontality through the enculturation of students into focus on grading and self-perception as customers. If you are buying a service, you don’t want the provider to say they are learning on the job. The more administrative responsibility for things like visas, careers, etc. is offloaded to staff, the less they are able to be co-learners.
From Eleanor Dare to Everyone: (1:51 pm)
PREVENT is the ultimate affront to that
From Aaron Tan to Everyone: (1:51 pm)
I am thinking less of a collective body than a communal body ? So again, the question of habitual spaces, of use and re-use etc
From Galia Kollectiv to Everyone: (1:51 pm)
YES!!!
From Kim Coleman to Everyone: (1:54 pm)
Yes! And It’s enabled us to all see each other here on the PhD which has been great. Events such as this are so good as well as having problems
From Roy Claire Potter to Everyone: (1:54 pm)
I’m thinking about how ‘encounter’ (and teaching towards it, which is the proposition in my paper’s title) can be engendered, in order to preserve the possibility of circulating voice i.e. encountering attempts to speak when failure is the game. I’m wondering about this in with the issue of blended learning for example, removing the ‘encounter’ with the staging of the object and how this effects the tutor student dialogue.. And, to bring it back to our discussion here, if the ‘object’ in question here is the authority of the academic as some sort of governing body, is this something we need to keep encountering..